Immoral. Sleazy. Deranged. Greedy. Lazy. Bad mother. So on and so forth.
But would the type of person the defense team sees as an enemy who deserves to be utterly destroyed and discredited, teach another adult to read?
We can't be talking about the same woman.
But we are.
Of course, if you buy into the image the defense team and all those who call the alleged victim a 'ho have created, you aren't likely to believe anything that makes her seem as human and as fragile as an ordinary woman. One who would be traumatized if she were raped by three men and who after using all the adrenaline she has to get away, could slip into unconsciousness.
The case will be decided by the courts, but just as the defense claims their clients have been judged without all the facts so has this alleged victim.
Do you really think defense attorneys would paint a rosier picture of the alleged victim if she had been a 16-year old?
Read this interview before you answer: Ethics and the defense attorney
If you think these 'victims' deserved the treatment they received, will you think the same if you or your sister or your mother is raped? I pray you never have to find out. Just remember that the defense attorneys only care how their actions impact their clients. Victims are simply opponents to be discredited and defeated.
News Observer: Mother, dancer, accuser
Technorati tags: duke+lacrosse duke+rape rape sexual+assault feminism politics crime