Aaron Graves, Duke's associate vice president for campus safety and security, said the campus officer did nothing wrong as he "documented what took place" in the hours after the rape was reported, including "what he felt or perceived he heard" from Durham police.I have to wonder if any of these people ever played Telephone. For those not familiar with this game, the first person whispers something in the next person's ear and then that person whispers what they heard to the next person and so on until the last person tells everyone the message.
For those who haven't played this game, the message quickly gets jumbled.
From what I've read from the Bowen-Chambers report about the flow of information from the investigators who interviewed the alleged victim to the Duke leadership, we have an institutionalized version of Telephone. Yet many continue to take these intermediary messages, which may or may not be within 6 degrees of separation of their original source, as if they came directly from the alleged victim herself.
Here are details about the victim that have been verified and which came from an official primary source (vs. coming from defense team or those involved in possible criminal activity):
- Alleged victim unconscious in car at grocery store
- Alleged victim in emotional distress at hospital (from Duke report linked above)
- Rape exam found results consistent with sexual assault (from a variety of sources)
- Alleged victim had a highly emotional reaction to seeing pictures of a limited number of lacrosse team members before saying what caused that reaction
- DNA evidence recovered from at least one fingernail at least partially matches one lacrosse player
But some people refuse to give this primary information any weight and continue to insist that this alleged victim must be considered the true perpetrator in this case because one man filed a report based on unverified secondhand information.
Technorati tags: rape crime politics sexual assault feminism women Duke+rape Duke+lacrosse