Rape is a violent sexual assault, where one person forcibly makes another do sexual acts through either the threat of injury or actual harm.This definition is NOT the definition of rape. It is blind to all rapes where stereotypical violence is absent.
The crime of rape (or "first-degree sexual assault" in some states) generally refers to non-consensual sexual intercourse that is committed by physical force, threat of injury, or other duress. A lack of consent can include the victim's inability to say "no" to intercourse, due to the effects of drugs or alcohol. Rape can occur when the offender and victim have a pre-existing relationship (sometimes called "date rape"), or even when the offender is the victim's spouse.The only possible flaw in this second, broader definition is "sexual intercourse" since that might exclude sexual assaults committed by one man against another man (where no vaginal intercourse = no rape) or rape which uses foreign objects to sexually violate the victim. This becomes a bigger problem when people don't see rape as a possible descriptor because the rapist wasn't charged with rape due to the limitations of the rape statute which have nothing to do with the severity of the sexual assault.
Many people assume that rapes which fit the first, incomplete definition are automatically more traumatic than rapes which only fit the second, more complete definition. If that assumption is entrenched enough, it can prevent people -- including jurors -- from seeing all rapists for what they are.
This rape blindness can cause people who know the facts of a rape case to call the rape victim a liar who made a false accusation of rape. They do this when it is in fact them who has carelessly made a false accusation against a real rape victim.
Because of the frequency of rape blindness, many rapists decide that the best thing to do is to exploit this phenomenom. They hide their criminal activity in plain sight. Rather than jumping out of the bushes to rape a stranger, they introduce themselves to their potential victims and sometimes go so far as to become part of their eventual rape victim's circle of trusted friends.
Their defense will be 2-prong:
1) "It was consensual."
2) Relying on those who say rape cases between people who know each other are a "he said, she said" case where the truth can never be determined.
Note: This, "It's a he said, she said situation" is another form of rape blindness which acknowledges the possibility of rape (like the possible existence of the unicorn) so as to not seem like a rape apologist, while denying that anyone except the rape victim and rapist will ever know what really happened and therefore we must all act as if no rape could have happened.
Here's an example that doesn't fit the first, limited definition of rape:
Even though this man used a non-violent threat and coercion through deception (not included in the first definition of rape), what he did was clearly considered by the police to be a real rape.
Two hours later, McCoy allegedly approached a 17 year old girl on Union Turnpike
in Hillcrest and identified himself as a police officer a third time. He told the teenager that he needed to question her before driving her to a Jamaica Avenue motel. There he wrote notes and spoke into a walkie talkie before allegedly forcing her to have sex with him. He threatened her with arrest if she didn’t comply.
McCoy faces charges of predatory sexual assault, first degree rape, criminal sexual act, coercion and first degree criminal impersonation. If convicted, he faces 25 years to life in prison.
Many people also reject this full definition of rape because they want to believe if they were in any situation where there wasn't a threat of physical violence or an actual physical assault -- which rendered them physically powerless to fight back -- that they would escape without being raped. Because they imagine they could have escaped, they have trouble viewing the victim as a completely innocent victim. "Duh. If only the victim had ___, nothing bad would have happened."
Once they do that, they can fool themselves into feeling disgust for rape victims' bad choices instead of the sympathy they say they feel for all "real" rape victims.
The rape blindness is complete if they feel any sympathy for the rapist and decide that feeling is proof that the rapist isn't a rapist because real rapists would make them feel nothing but disgust.
There's only one cure for rape blindness. The willingness to set aside monster myths and myths about what we'd do if we were in a particular situation and look at whether it meets this definition, including the follow up paragraphs:
For sexual contact to be considered consensual sexual interaction, the action must be committed free of physical force, threat of injury, control, duress, manipulation or threat of retaliation.
Consent cannot be given if there is any inability to say "no," especially due to the effects of drugs or alcohol. Consensual sexual intercourse cannot happen when one person has physical, spiritual or legal control over the other. If one party asks the other to leave or to stop and that person does not do so, any sexual contact which follows shall be considered non-consensual.
Once a negative response has been given to a request or an attempted action, the person who gave the negative response must initiate that action or request it verbally without prompting from the person who made the request.
Consent may be withdrawn at any time for any reason or for no reason. Consensual sex is a mutual act and must not harm or distress any participant.
Technorati tags: rape crime politics sexual violence sexual assault feminism